Is Diamond OA a utopia?

Hi all! There have been several publications recently raising concerns about the sustainability of Diamond Open Access, questioning whether it might be a utopia “too good to be true.”

I’m sharing a few key resources on this topic: the already-mentioned Diamond Open Access – Too Good to Be True?” by Ulrich Herb, shared by @anna.hughes in a fellow discussion, and the new article by Maryam Sayab, “Diamond Dreams, Unequal Realities: The Promise and Pitfalls of No-APC Open Access.”

Maryam Sayab concludes with this:

“Ideals alone cannot sustain journals. ‘Free’ is never free. (…) The most important question is not how many journals are Diamond, but how many can endure — and what we, as a global community, are willing to do to ensure they do. Access is the first step; equity and sustainability must follow.”

Following up on this article, I’m also sharing the letter written by the editorial board of the journal mentioned in it. In their statement, they explain why they ultimately decided to wind down the journal, facing too many sustainability challenges. It’s interesting to read as an example of why they felt that Diamond OA didn’t work for them, and it raises important questions about what kind of systemic and structural support is truly needed to make Diamond OA viable in the long run.

2 Likes

For Miguel Abensour, the purpose of the utopia (as an imaginable form) is the “education of desire”–in other words it helps us become better people and conceive better societies. I am all for the utopianism of Diamond OA!

1 Like

I can understand the frustration within some of us. We put so much effort in the diamond OA journal and there is insufficient reward. We run CEUR-WS.org as grassroot diamond OA publisher since 1995. It only worked so far because we could put the workload on many shoulders. It is in my view necessary to find the right roof organization that provides a) the infrastructure and b) the legal backup.